Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1993-05-07 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1993-05-07 Senate Journal Page 2114 HB 124 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 124(FIN) "An Act establishing capital project matching grant programs for municipalities and unincorporated communities; and providing for an effective date" was read the second time. 1993-05-07 Senate Journal Page 2115 HB 124 Senator Pearce moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the Finance Senate Committee Substitute offered on page 2110. Senator Duncan objected, then withdrew his objection. There being no further objections, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 123(FIN) was adopted. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 124(FIN) was read the second time. Senator Adams offered Amendment No. 1 : Page 3, line 31: After "section.": Insert "A city located in a borough may list a borough project to which it plans to contribute." Page 4, line 1: After "AS 37.06.030.": Insert "If a city lists a borough project, the local share attributable to the city's contribution may be paid by either municipality or shared between them as they agree." Page 4, line 8: Delete "to the municipality" Page 4, line 9: After "section.": Insert "An appropriation shall be paid to the municipality or, if a city has elected to contribute to a borough project, to the borough." Page 4, line 11: After "account": Insert "or, if a city has elected to contribute to a borough project, from the city's account," 1993-05-07 Senate Journal Page 2116 HB 124 Senator Adams moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 124(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Rieger, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 1 failed. Senators Donley, Ellis offered Amendment No. 2 : Page 8, line 17: Delete "30" Insert "25" Senator Donley moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 2. Objections were heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 124(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 1993-05-07 Senate Journal Page 2117 HB 124 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, Amendment No. 2 failed. Senator Taylor moved and asked unanimous consent that SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 124(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Objections were heard. The question being: "Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 124(FIN) be advanced to third reading?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 124(FIN) Advance from Second to Third Reading? YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff and so, the bill failed to be advanced to third reading.